From: "Martin Langhoff (CatalystIT)" <martin@catalyst.net.nz>
To: ltuikov@yahoo.com
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>,
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>,
Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>,
Martyn Smith <martyn@catalyst.net.nz>,
Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: perhaps time to remove git_blame from gitweb, and git-annotate?
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 18:37:26 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45273D16.7050205@catalyst.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061006175234.41182.qmail@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Luben Tuikov wrote:
>>>Do people have reason to favor annotate over blame? To keep
>>>existing people's scripts working I think we should add a small
>>>amount of code to blame.c to default to compatibility mode when
>>>the command is called as git-annotate at least for a while, but
>>>other than that I do not see much issue against scheduling for
>>>annotate's removal.
>>
>>+1. Although I would leave git-annotate in git, if only to meet
>>expectations of new git users.
>
>
> I agree with Junio's assessment of the situation.
+1 -- I need to test that the switch to git-blame for git-cvsserver
works well for Eclipse end users. Will try and fit that next week
somehow ;-)
martin
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin @ Catalyst .Net .NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
OFFICE: +64(4)916-7224 MOB: +64(21)364-017
Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler - Einstein
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-07 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-05 0:59 [PATCH 1/2] gitweb: blame: Print just a single new line char per table row Luben Tuikov
2006-10-05 2:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-10-05 6:48 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-10-05 8:13 ` perhaps time to remove git_blame from gitweb, and git-annotate? Junio C Hamano
2006-10-06 13:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-10-06 17:52 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-10-07 5:37 ` Martin Langhoff (CatalystIT) [this message]
2006-10-06 16:16 ` Petr Baudis
2006-10-06 18:55 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-10-06 19:08 ` Petr Baudis
2006-10-06 20:21 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-10-09 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/1] Remove git-annotate.perl and create a builtin-alias for git-blame Ryan Anderson
2006-10-09 10:37 ` perhaps time to remove git_blame from gitweb, and git-annotate? Ryan Anderson
2006-10-09 22:33 ` Obituary for git-annotate Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45273D16.7050205@catalyst.net.nz \
--to=martin@catalyst.net.nz \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=freku045@student.liu.se \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
--cc=martyn@catalyst.net.nz \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
--cc=ryan@michonline.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.