Re: 2.6.18-rc7-mm1

[Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:55:17PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:45:06 -0700
>>> "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> - It took maybe ten hours solid work to get this dogpile vaguely
>>>>>   compiling and limping to a login prompt on x86, x86_64 and powerpc. 
>>>>>   I guess it's worth briefly testing if you're keen.
>>>> PPC64 blades shit themselves in a strange way. Possibly the udev
>>>> breakage you mentioned? Hard to tell really if people are going to
>>>> go around breaking userspace compatibility ;-(
>>> What version of udev is it running?
>> Ok, this is not a blade, but a ppc lpar.  Its running the following
>> version of udev:
>>
>> udevinfo, version 021_bk
>>
>> (Assuming of course the help for udev info -V is not lying when it says
>> "-V       print udev version".)
> 
> What distro shipped 021_bk for a version of udev?  What is running on
> this machine?
> 
> (yeah, I know this is a old message, but I'm trying to fix up the udev
> issues right now...)

Hmmm.  The machine claims to be running SuSE.  We have it recorded as
SLES9, but I actually can't find any way to tell from the machine which
actual release thereof it is.

This version of ud
gekko-lp1:~ # udevinfo -V
udevinfo, version 021_bk
gekko-lp1:~ # rpm -qa | grep udev
udev-021-36.32

This seems to be the correct version for the first GA of SLES9.

-apw