From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Courtier-Dutton Subject: Re: [alsa-cvslog] alsa-kernel: snd-emu10k1: Add emu1010 internal clock rate control for 44100 or 48000. Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:23:59 +0100 Message-ID: <452BD72F.6000605@superbug.co.uk> References: <1160500766.629.84.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1160500766.629.84.camel@mindpipe> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Lee Revell Cc: alsa-devel List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Lee Revell wrote: > On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 19:09 +0200, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: >> + /* Allow DLL to settle */ >> + udelay(10000); > > Should it be "usleep"? Spinning for 10ms in the kernel could be > considered rude... > > Lee > Yes. I used the wrong one. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV