From: Eli Stair <estair@ilm.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: Fix bug where new drives added to an md array sometimes don't sync properly.
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:42:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <452C05AF.2070807@ilm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17706.65210.999441.373846@cse.unsw.edu.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4550 bytes --]
Thanks Neil,
I just gave this patched module a shot on four systems. So far, I
haven't seen the device number inappropriately increment, though as per
a mail I sent a short while ago that seemed remedied by using the 1.2
superblock, for some reason. However, it appears to have introduced a
new issue, and another is unresolved by it:
// BUG 1
The single-command syntax to fail and remove a drive is still failing, I
do not know if this is somehow contributing to the further (new) issues
below:
[root@gtmp06 tmp]# mdadm /dev/md0 --fail /dev/dm-0 --remove /dev/dm-0
mdadm: set /dev/dm-0 faulty in /dev/md0
mdadm: hot remove failed for /dev/dm-0: Device or resource busy
[root@gtmp06 tmp]# mdadm /dev/md0 --remove /dev/dm-0
mdadm: hot removed /dev/dm-0
// BUG 2
Now, upon adding or re-adding a "fail...remove"'d drive, it is not used
for resync. I realized previously that added drives weren't re-synced
until the existing array build was done, then they were grabbed. This
however is a clean/active array that is rejecting the drive.
I've performed this identically on both a clean & active array, as well
as a newly-created (resync'ing) array, to the same effect. Even after
rebuild or reboot, the removed drive isn't taken back and remains listed
as a "faulty spare", with dmesg indicating that it is "non-fresh".
// DMESG:
md: kicking non-fresh dm-0 from array!
// ARRAY status 'mdadm -D /dev/md0'
State : active, degraded
Active Devices : 13
Working Devices : 13
Failed Devices : 1
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : near=1, offset=2
Chunk Size : 512K
Name : 0
UUID : 05c2faf4:facfcad3:ba33b140:100f428a
Events : 22
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 253 1 0 active sync /dev/dm-1
1 253 2 1 active sync /dev/dm-2
2 253 5 2 active sync /dev/dm-5
3 253 4 3 active sync /dev/dm-4
4 253 6 4 active sync /dev/dm-6
5 253 3 5 active sync /dev/dm-3
6 253 13 6 active sync /dev/dm-13
7 0 0 7 removed
8 253 7 8 active sync /dev/dm-7
9 253 8 9 active sync /dev/dm-8
10 253 9 10 active sync /dev/dm-9
11 253 11 11 active sync /dev/dm-11
12 253 10 12 active sync /dev/dm-10
13 253 12 13 active sync /dev/dm-12
7 253 0 - faulty spare /dev/dm-0
Let me know what more I can do to help track this down. I'm reverting
this patch, since it is behaving less-well than before. Will be happy
to try others.
Attached are typescript of the drive remove/add sessions and all output.
/eli
Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday October 6, estair@ilm.com wrote:
> >
> > This patch has resolved the immediate issue I was having on 2.6.18 with
> > RAID10. Previous to this change, after removing a device from the array
> > (with mdadm --remove), physically pulling the device and
> > changing/re-inserting, the "Number" of the new device would be
> > incremented on top of the highest-present device in the array. Now, it
> > resumes its previous place.
> >
> > Does this look to be 'correct' output for a 14-drive array, which dev 8
> > was failed/removed from then "add"'ed? I'm trying to determine why the
> > device doesn't get pulled back into the active configuration and
> > re-synced. Any comments?
>
> Does this patch help?
>
>
>
> Fix count of degraded drives in raid10.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
>
> ### Diffstat output
> ./drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff .prev/drivers/md/raid10.c ./drivers/md/raid10.c
> --- .prev/drivers/md/raid10.c 2006-10-09 14:18:00.000000000 +1000
> +++ ./drivers/md/raid10.c 2006-10-05 20:10:07.000000000 +1000
> @@ -2079,7 +2079,7 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
> disk = conf->mirrors + i;
>
> if (!disk->rdev ||
> - !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)) {
> + !test_bit(In_sync, &disk->rdev->flags)) {
> disk->head_position = 0;
> mddev->degraded++;
> }
>
>
> NeilBrown
>
[-- Attachment #2: gtmp-mdadm-add-drive-after-boot-to-degraded-array-fails-to-resync.log.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 1349 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: gtmp-mdadm-remove-drive-from-activeclean-array-add-fails.log.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 11331 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-10 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20061005171233.6542.patches@notabene>
2006-10-05 7:13 ` [PATCH] md: Fix bug where new drives added to an md array sometimes don't sync properly NeilBrown
2006-10-05 19:26 ` Eli Stair
2006-10-06 22:42 ` Eli Stair
2006-10-10 2:00 ` Neil Brown
2006-10-10 20:42 ` Eli Stair [this message]
2006-10-11 0:00 ` Eli Stair
2006-10-12 10:02 ` Michael Tokarev
2006-10-17 0:13 ` Neil Brown
2006-10-18 22:18 ` Eli Stair
2006-10-20 3:24 ` Neil Brown
2006-10-10 20:20 ` Eli Stair
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=452C05AF.2070807@ilm.com \
--to=estair@ilm.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.