From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <452CC887.8070400@domain.hid>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:33:43 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai, RTAI, pros and cons
References: <54b161f50610110313u3476ef4dsd3b5d6577ec2d119@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <54b161f50610110313u3476ef4dsd3b5d6577ec2d119@domain.hid>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enig886E781A259D1FCB5E4E3356"
Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid
List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai
	<xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-help>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
To: Frits de Klark <mailing.xenomai@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig886E781A259D1FCB5E4E3356
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Frits de Klark wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>=20
> I was wondering if anyone can convince me why to choose Xenomai over RT=
AI?
> You may be thinking "how can we convince you if we don't know what you =
need
> it for?". Well, I'm confident that the thing I need it for can almost
> equally been done with both Xenomai and RTAI. I'm more curious what you=
r
> opinion is about development speed, support (documentation, community),=

> portability between platforms, API completeness, etc.
> I read a LOT the last couple of weeks about Xenomai as well as RTAI, bu=
t I
> can't seem to make a clear choice.
>=20
> I'm sorry to be asking this (because it has probably been asked a thous=
and
> times before, but I just wasn't able to find it).
> Thanks very much in advance!

See https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2006-08/msg00115.html, but
feel free to ask what may remain unclear.

Jan


--------------enig886E781A259D1FCB5E4E3356
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFLMiKniDOoMHTA+kRAo3lAJ413i1Qb+e9t7ZAffjMAj/w5gOb0ACbBNyv
pbZOXjfprFKVbCte9K9cKWU=
=1Vyi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig886E781A259D1FCB5E4E3356--