From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <452CCA4B.6010806@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:41:15 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Need for non-rt open/close References: <452CC669.2010308@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <452CC669.2010308@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4721CE0ABCE07991D1E7D27E" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marcelo Coelho Cc: Xenomai help This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4721CE0ABCE07991D1E7D27E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marcelo Coelho wrote: > Greetings, >=20 >=20 > Is there a special reason for the need of having a non-rt open and clos= e > functions in order to have a sucessfull rtdm driver registration? There is only a need for a non-rt close handler in order to enforce a device instance cleanup (ATM only via echo FD_NUMBER > /proc/xenomai/rtdm/open_fildes, future version will also do cleanup on process termination). Jan --------------enig4721CE0ABCE07991D1E7D27E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFLMpLniDOoMHTA+kRAonoAJ4kUBVYJmIm2yjKfnRNHQL+UTFZVACeLM1H qfd2IEa+NY37lnDJxXh6Fv0= =XLiq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4721CE0ABCE07991D1E7D27E--