From: John Wendel <jwendel10@comcast.net>
To: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:34:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <452DC5C5.3040507@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <452DAA26.6080200@redhat.com>
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>
>> Here is what I think is happening..
>>
>> journal_unmap_buffer() - cleaned the buffer, since its outside EOF, but
>> its a part of the same page. So it remained on the page->buffers
>> list. (at this time its not part of any transaction).
>>
>> Then, ordererd_commit_write() called journal_dirty_data() and we added
>> all these buffers to BJ_SyncData list. (at this time buffer is clean -
>> not dirty).
>>
>> Now msync() called __set_page_dirty_buffers() and dirtied *all* the
>> buffers attached to this page.
>>
>> journal_submit_data_buffers() got around to this buffer and tried to
>> submit the buffer...
>
> This seems about right, but one thing bothers me in the traces; it
> seems like there is some locking that is missing. In
> http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/traces/eric_ext3_oops1.txt
> for example, it looks like journal_dirty_data gets started, but then
> the buffer_head is acted on by journal_unmap_buffer, which decides
> this buffer is part of the running transaction, past EOF, and clears
> mapped, dirty, etc. Then journal_dirty_data picks up again, decides
> that the buffer is not on the right list (now BJ_None) and puts it
> back on BJ_SyncData. Then it gets picked up by
> journal_submit_data_buffers and submitted, and oops.
>
> Talking with Stephen, it seemed like the page lock should synchronize
> these threads, but I've found that we can get to journal_dirty_data
> acting on the buffer heads w/o having the page locked...
>
> I'm still digging, and, er, grasping at straws here... Am I off base?
>
> -Eric
>
>
>> Andrew is right - only option for us to check the filesize in the
>> write out path and skip the buffers beyond EOF.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Badari
>>
Here's another data point for your consideration. I've been seeing this
error since I started running 2.6.18, I assumed it was hardware, so I've
tried 3 different disks, a PATA and 2 SATA drives, with VIA and Promise
controllers, the error has occurred on all of them. I see the error
infrequently, always when downloading lots of small files from Usenet
and building, copying and deleting large (200 - 300 MB). I haven't ever
had an oops/panic, just this error. When I run fsck, I always see a
single message that "deleted inode nnn has zero dtime". I hope this will
be useful.
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5):
ext3_free_blocks_sb: bit already cleared for block 4740550
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: Aborting journal on device hda5.
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in
ext3_free_blocks_sb: Journal has aborted
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in
ext3_free_blocks_sb: Journal has aborted
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in
ext3_reserve_inode_write: Journal has aborted
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in
ext3_truncate: Journal has aborted
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in
ext3_reserve_inode_write: Journal has aborted
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in
ext3_orphan_del: Journal has aborted
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in
ext3_reserve_inode_write: Journal has aborted
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in
ext3_delete_inode: Journal has aborted
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing
b_committed_data
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing
b_committed_data
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: ext3_abort called.
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5):
ext3_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal
Oct 11 20:37:32 Godzilla kernel: Remounting filesystem read-only
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-12 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-02 19:47 2.6.18 ext3 panic Dave Jones
2006-10-03 5:22 ` Dave Jones
2006-10-03 5:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-03 6:19 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-03 6:40 ` Dave Jones
2006-10-03 16:45 ` Dave Jones
2006-10-09 19:46 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-09 19:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-09 21:59 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-09 22:50 ` Dave Jones
2006-10-10 14:11 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-10 18:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-10 22:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-10 22:25 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-11 1:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-11 10:33 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-11 13:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-11 14:22 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-11 17:54 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-12 2:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-12 4:34 ` John Wendel [this message]
2006-10-12 6:57 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2006-10-12 12:28 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-12 13:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-12 16:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-12 16:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-12 20:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-12 21:55 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-12 21:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-12 22:34 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-13 7:56 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-13 16:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-16 16:54 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-16 16:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-09 22:40 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2006-10-10 13:16 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-10 16:39 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=452DC5C5.3040507@comcast.net \
--to=jwendel10@comcast.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.