All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Strange entries in /proc/acpi/thermal_zone for Thinkpad X60
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:57:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <452F0EB7.2060508@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.P/oAhFV0AVrh8PKSKzP+xVGih2s@ifi.uio.no>

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> I have a Thinkpad X60 with an Intel Core Duo T2400.  In 
> /proc/acpi/thermal_zone, I'm getting two subdirectories, each with their 
> own set of files:
> 

So your machine has two thermal zones..

> The interesting thing is that the two sets of files are not consistent - 
> sometimes they don't even show the same temperature.

I would expect they wouldn't, otherwise there would be no reason for the 
BIOS people to set up two thermal zones..

> 
> The reason I'm interested in this is that I think it's behind some of my 
> cpufreq problems.  Sometimes the kernel decides that I just can't raise 
> the max frequency above 1GHz, because its been thermally limited (I've 
> put printks in to confirm that its the ACPI thermal limit on the policy 
> notifier chain which is limiting the max speed).  It seems to me that 
> having a thermal zone for each core is a BIOS bug, since they're really 
> the same chip, but the THM1 entries should be ignored.  I don't believe 

How do you know they are one for each core? ACPI thermal zones can be 
anywhere in the machine that needs OS-controlled cooling. Could be the 
CPU heatsink, voltage regulator, or someplace else.

> the CPU has ever approached either 97 C, let alone 127; while I put it 
> under a fair amount of load, it is sitting on a desktop with no airflow 
> obstructions, so if it really is overheating it suggests a serious 
> design problem with the hardware.
> 
> But I'm just speculating; I'm not really sure what all this means.  Any 
> clues?

I think we need more information to decide what is going on here.. what 
temperatures are registering in the thermal zones when the CPU clock is 
being limited?

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/


       reply	other threads:[~2006-10-13  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.P/oAhFV0AVrh8PKSKzP+xVGih2s@ifi.uio.no>
2006-10-13  3:57 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2006-10-13  4:28   ` Strange entries in /proc/acpi/thermal_zone for Thinkpad X60 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-10-13 18:10     ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-10-12 22:19 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-10-12 22:19 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-10-13  4:53 ` Len Brown
2006-10-13 14:44 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=452F0EB7.2060508@shaw.ca \
    --to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.