From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailgw.cs.york.ac.uk (mailgw.cs.york.ac.uk [144.32.40.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CB767B99 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 03:59:26 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <45311FE5.3080400@cs.york.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:35:33 +0100 From: Ameet Patil MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Steiner Subject: Re: Inquiring about your Linux 2.6.17.1 port to XUP References: <45300A50.2010000@vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <45300A50.2010000@vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: "Dr. Neil Audsley" , Ameet Patil , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Neil, Please help yourself! Everything in http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/xupv2pro/ is for public access! And yes! You are right... http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/ is not for public. Do post your comments or bugs (if any) on the linux embedded ppc mailing list (linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org). cheers, -Ameet Neil Steiner wrote: > Dear Sirs: > > I came across a link to > http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/xupv2pro/ on comp.arch.fpga, > but noticed that http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/ requires > login access, and so I wasn't sure whether or not your Linux 2.6.17.1 > files where intended for public consumption. > > I don't have a pressing need for a 2.6 kernel, and have instead been > following directions from the University of Washington > (http://www.cs.washington.edu/research/lis/empart/xup_ppc_linux.shtml) > and Brigham Young University > (http://splish.ee.byu.edu/projects/LinuxFPGA/configuring.htm) for a 2.4 > kernel, but seeing the link to your site did pique my curiosity. > > My question then is simply whether I may refer to your files if they > prove to be useful, or if they were supposed to be restricted. > > Neil