From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Subject: QEMU patch queue
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:30:48 -0500
Message-ID: <453BAAC8.5040909@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Howdy,

Are we still maintaining a QEMU patch queue anywhere or are patches just 
going right into unstable?  I took a look at Christian's pq tree on 
xenbits but it appears to have not been updated in a while.

I'm currently looking at the V2E work and there are quite a lot of QEMU 
changes (a lot of which probably get us closer back to mainline).

How do people feel about getting rid of the full QEMU tree in unstable 
and just having a patch queue?  I know there was talk about just using a 
patch queue for linux for 3.0.4.

I'd be willing to submit a patch to add the appropriate makefile magic 
so that make grabbed a copy of QEMU from somewhere and applied the patches.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori