From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: QEMU patch queue Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:37:15 -0500 Message-ID: <453C0EBB.3020204@us.ibm.com> References: <453BAAC8.5040909@us.ibm.com> <3AAA99889D105740BE010EB6D5A5A3B2050718@paddington.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3AAA99889D105740BE010EB6D5A5A3B2050718@paddington.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt Cc: xen-devel , Christian Limpach List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Pratt wrote: >> Are we still maintaining a QEMU patch queue anywhere or are patches >> > just > >> going right into unstable? >> > > There already is a patch queue for QEMU within the unstable tree: > tools/ioemu/patches/ > > The full tree is kept as a convenience, but the patch queue is the > definitive version. > There are changesets (such as the recent VNC password) that don't appear to have corresponding patches in tools/ioemu/patches. Is the idea to apply the patches to the tree and have the patches in hg? Should people be submitting patches against tools/ioemu/patches? Regards, Anthony Liguori > Ian >