From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <453C84FE.3050508@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:01:50 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] x86 FPU switches routines. References: <453C7C48.30602@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <453C7C48.30602@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig24B31F86816CC65AE8D01056" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig24B31F86816CC65AE8D01056 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > As once discussed with Heikki, and after a first missed attempt, here > is a patch for x86 which attempts to cope correctly with Linux (non > real-time) drivers using FPU in kernel-space. >=20 > I tested it on my laptop without drivers using FPU, and it appears to > work correctly, but it would be nice if people that had problems with > the previous attempt (if I remember correctly, on old pentiums and on > AMD processors) could test this patch. Just fired up on a Pentium MMX which used to have problems with the first approad. Switchtest reports no problems. What about writing a simple test case for the non-RT in-kernel FPU usage?= Jan --------------enig24B31F86816CC65AE8D01056 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFPIT+niDOoMHTA+kRAhTAAJ9x9+tKqf2v5Pq+YibRCrOVRF1O/QCghKDL bDNUA/h4IIq8e6L73WDKNXw= =cgV6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig24B31F86816CC65AE8D01056--