From: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/5] I/O statistics through request queues
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:49:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <453E9892.1010408@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453E7B1F.7020602@cfl.rr.com>
Phillip Susi wrote:
> Martin Peschke wrote:
>> Well, the instrumentation "on demand" aspect is half of the truth.
>> A probe inserted through kprobes impacts performance more than static
>> instrumentation.
>
> True, but given that there are going to be a number of things you might
> want to instrument at some point, and that at any given time you might
> only be interested in a few of those, it likely will be better overall
> to spend some more time only on the few than less time on the many.
Im sure there will be more discussions to sort out which data should be
retrieved through which kind of instrumentation, and to find the right mix.
But I won't dare speculating about the outcome. I am just tossing another
request for data into the discussion (important, in my eyes), along with a
method for retrieving such data (less important, in my eyes).
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-24 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-21 12:57 [Patch 0/5] I/O statistics through request queues Martin Peschke
2006-10-23 11:37 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-23 18:11 ` Martin Peschke
2006-10-23 20:02 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-24 16:02 ` Martin Peschke
2006-10-24 16:20 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-24 20:38 ` Phillip Susi
2006-10-24 22:27 ` Martin Peschke
2006-10-25 17:50 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-26 11:07 ` Martin Peschke
2006-10-26 12:13 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-26 13:37 ` Martin Peschke
2006-10-26 14:02 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-26 15:36 ` Martin Peschke
2006-10-26 19:11 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-24 23:04 ` Martin Peschke
2006-10-25 5:12 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-25 10:32 ` Martin Peschke
2006-10-25 10:42 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-02 14:39 ` martin
2006-11-02 14:46 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-23 18:39 ` Phillip Susi
2006-10-24 16:05 ` Martin Peschke
2006-10-24 20:44 ` Phillip Susi
2006-10-24 22:49 ` Martin Peschke [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=453E9892.1010408@de.ibm.com \
--to=mp3@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.