All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@amd.com>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	daniel@ffwll.ch, "David M Nieto" <David.Nieto@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Convert to common fdinfo format v3
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:18:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45400d34-b7c8-851a-bc15-e9b4171c0356@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511120250.3066-1-christian.koenig@amd.com>

Hey Christian,

On 5/11/2022 2:02 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Convert fdinfo format to one documented in drm-usage-stats.rst.
> 
> It turned out that the existing implementation was actually completely
> nonsense. The calculated percentages indeed represented the usage of the
> engine, but with varying time slices.
> 
> So 10% usage for application A could mean something completely different
> than 10% usage for application B.
> 
> Completely nuke that and just use the now standardized nanosecond
> interface.
> 
> v2: drop the documentation change for now, nuke percentage calculation
> v3: only account for each hw_ip, move the time_spend to the ctx mgr.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: David M Nieto <David.Nieto@amd.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c     |   2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c    | 234 ++++++++++-----------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.h    |  23 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fdinfo.c |  41 ++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c    |   2 +-
>   5 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> index 01853431249d..43b97ad3c6be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> @@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
>   
>   	p->fence = dma_fence_get(&job->base.s_fence->finished);
>   
> -	amdgpu_ctx_add_fence(p->ctx, entity, p->fence, &seq);
> +	seq = amdgpu_ctx_add_fence(&fpriv->ctx_mgr, p->ctx, entity, p->fence);
>   	amdgpu_cs_post_dependencies(p);
>   
>   	if ((job->preamble_status & AMDGPU_PREAMBLE_IB_PRESENT) &&
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
> index 8f0e6d93bb9c..5a0d67cc3d75 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
> @@ -135,9 +135,9 @@ static enum amdgpu_ring_priority_level amdgpu_ctx_sched_prio_to_ring_prio(int32_
>   
>   static unsigned int amdgpu_ctx_get_hw_prio(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx, u32 hw_ip)
>   {
> -	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
> -	int32_t ctx_prio;
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->mgr->adev;
>   	unsigned int hw_prio;
> +	int32_t ctx_prio;
>   
>   	ctx_prio = (ctx->override_priority == AMDGPU_CTX_PRIORITY_UNSET) ?
>   			ctx->init_priority : ctx->override_priority;
> @@ -162,17 +162,49 @@ static unsigned int amdgpu_ctx_get_hw_prio(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx, u32 hw_ip)
>   	return hw_prio;
>   }
>   
> +/* Calculate the time spend on the hw */
> +static ktime_t amdgpu_ctx_fence_time(struct dma_fence *fence)
> +{
> +	struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence;
> +
> +	if (!fence)
> +		return ns_to_ktime(0);
> +
> +	/* When the fence is not even scheduled it can't have spend time */
> +	s_fence = to_drm_sched_fence(fence);
> +	if (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT, &s_fence->scheduled.flags))
> +		return ns_to_ktime(0);
> +
> +	if (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT, &s_fence->finished.flags))
> +		return ktime_sub(ktime_get(), s_fence->scheduled.timestamp);
shouldn't this be s_fence->finished.timestamp instead of 
s_fence->scheduled.timestamp ?
> +
> +	return ktime_sub(s_fence->finished.timestamp,
> +			 s_fence->scheduled.timestamp);
> +}
> +
> +static ktime_t amdgpu_ctx_entity_time(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
> +				      struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *centity)
> +{
> +	ktime_t res = ns_to_ktime(0);
> +	uint32_t i;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&ctx->ring_lock);
> +	for (i = 0; i < amdgpu_sched_jobs; i++) {
> +		res = ktime_add(res, amdgpu_ctx_fence_time(centity->fences[i]));
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&ctx->ring_lock);
> +	return res;
> +}
>   
>   static int amdgpu_ctx_init_entity(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx, u32 hw_ip,
>   				  const u32 ring)
>   {
> -	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
> -	struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity;
>   	struct drm_gpu_scheduler **scheds = NULL, *sched = NULL;
> -	unsigned num_scheds = 0;
> -	int32_t ctx_prio;
> -	unsigned int hw_prio;
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->mgr->adev;
> +	struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity;
>   	enum drm_sched_priority drm_prio;
> +	unsigned int hw_prio, num_scheds;
> +	int32_t ctx_prio;
>   	int r;
>   
>   	entity = kzalloc(struct_size(entity, fences, amdgpu_sched_jobs),
> @@ -182,6 +214,7 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_init_entity(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx, u32 hw_ip,
>   
>   	ctx_prio = (ctx->override_priority == AMDGPU_CTX_PRIORITY_UNSET) ?
>   			ctx->init_priority : ctx->override_priority;
> +	entity->hw_ip = hw_ip;
>   	entity->sequence = 1;
>   	hw_prio = amdgpu_ctx_get_hw_prio(ctx, hw_ip);
>   	drm_prio = amdgpu_ctx_to_drm_sched_prio(ctx_prio);
> @@ -220,11 +253,29 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_init_entity(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx, u32 hw_ip,
>   	return r;
>   }
>   
> -static int amdgpu_ctx_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> +static ktime_t amdgpu_ctx_fini_entity(struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity)
> +{
> +	ktime_t res = ns_to_ktime(0);
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!entity)
> +		return res;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < amdgpu_sched_jobs; ++i) {
> +		res = ktime_add(res, amdgpu_ctx_fence_time(entity->fences[i]));
> +		dma_fence_put(entity->fences[i]);
Don't we need a corresponding _get() for this put() ? I had a quick look 
at amdgpu_ctx_fence_time() too, and it seems it had its own pair of 
get/put.

> +	}
> +
> +	kfree(entity);
> +	return res;
> +}
> +
> +static int amdgpu_ctx_init(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr,
>   			   int32_t priority,
>   			   struct drm_file *filp,
>   			   struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx)
>   {
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = mgr->adev;
>   	int r;
>   
>   	r = amdgpu_ctx_priority_permit(filp, priority);
> @@ -233,9 +284,8 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>   
>   	memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
>   
> -	ctx->adev = adev;
> -
>   	kref_init(&ctx->refcount);
> +	ctx->mgr = mgr;
>   	spin_lock_init(&ctx->ring_lock);
>   	mutex_init(&ctx->lock);
>   
> @@ -249,24 +299,10 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static void amdgpu_ctx_fini_entity(struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity)
> -{
> -
> -	int i;
> -
> -	if (!entity)
> -		return;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < amdgpu_sched_jobs; ++i)
> -		dma_fence_put(entity->fences[i]);
> -
> -	kfree(entity);
> -}
> -
>   static int amdgpu_ctx_get_stable_pstate(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
>   					u32 *stable_pstate)
>   {
> -	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->mgr->adev;
>   	enum amd_dpm_forced_level current_level;
>   
>   	current_level = amdgpu_dpm_get_performance_level(adev);
> @@ -294,7 +330,7 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_get_stable_pstate(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
>   static int amdgpu_ctx_set_stable_pstate(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
>   					u32 stable_pstate)
>   {
> -	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->mgr->adev;
>   	enum amd_dpm_forced_level level;
>   	int r;
>   
> @@ -340,7 +376,8 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_set_stable_pstate(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
>   static void amdgpu_ctx_fini(struct kref *ref)
>   {
>   	struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx = container_of(ref, struct amdgpu_ctx, refcount);
> -	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
> +	struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr = ctx->mgr;
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = mgr->adev;
>   	unsigned i, j, idx;
>   
>   	if (!adev)
> @@ -348,8 +385,10 @@ static void amdgpu_ctx_fini(struct kref *ref)
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i) {
>   		for (j = 0; j < AMDGPU_MAX_ENTITY_NUM; ++j) {
> -			amdgpu_ctx_fini_entity(ctx->entities[i][j]);
> -			ctx->entities[i][j] = NULL;
> +			ktime_t spend;
> +
> +			spend = amdgpu_ctx_fini_entity(ctx->entities[i][j]);
> +			atomic64_add(ktime_to_ns(spend), &mgr->time_spend[i]);
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> @@ -416,7 +455,7 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_alloc(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>   	}
>   
>   	*id = (uint32_t)r;
> -	r = amdgpu_ctx_init(adev, priority, filp, ctx);
> +	r = amdgpu_ctx_init(mgr, priority, filp, ctx);
>   	if (r) {
>   		idr_remove(&mgr->ctx_handles, *id);
>   		*id = 0;
> @@ -666,19 +705,20 @@ int amdgpu_ctx_put(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -void amdgpu_ctx_add_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
> -			  struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
> -			  struct dma_fence *fence, uint64_t *handle)
> +uint64_t amdgpu_ctx_add_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr,
> +			      struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
> +			      struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
> +			      struct dma_fence *fence)
>   {
>   	struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *centity = to_amdgpu_ctx_entity(entity);
>   	uint64_t seq = centity->sequence;
>   	struct dma_fence *other = NULL;
>   	unsigned idx = 0;
> +	ktime_t spend;
>   
>   	idx = seq & (amdgpu_sched_jobs - 1);
>   	other = centity->fences[idx];
> -	if (other)
> -		BUG_ON(!dma_fence_is_signaled(other));
> +	BUG_ON(other && !dma_fence_is_signaled(other));
>   
>   	dma_fence_get(fence);
>   
> @@ -687,9 +727,40 @@ void amdgpu_ctx_add_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
>   	centity->sequence++;
>   	spin_unlock(&ctx->ring_lock);
>   
> +	spend = amdgpu_ctx_fence_time(other);
> +	atomic64_add(ktime_to_ns(spend), &mgr->time_spend[centity->hw_ip]);
> +
>   	dma_fence_put(other);
> -	if (handle)
> -		*handle = seq;
> +	return seq;
> +}
> +
> +ktime_t amdgpu_ctx_mgr_usage(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr, uint32_t hw_ip)
> +{
> +	struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	uint32_t id;
> +	ktime_t res;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * This is a little bit racy because it can be that ctx or fences are
> +	 * destroyed just in the moment we try to account them. But that is ok
> +	 * since exactly that case is explicitely allowed by the interface.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
> +	res = ns_to_ktime(atomic64_read(&mgr->time_spend[hw_ip]));
> +	idr_for_each_entry(&mgr->ctx_handles, ctx, id) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[hw_ip]; ++i) {
> +			struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *centity;
> +
> +			centity = ctx->entities[hw_ip][i];
> +			if (!centity)
> +				continue;
> +			res = ktime_add(res, amdgpu_ctx_entity_time(ctx,
> +								    centity));
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> +	return res;
>   }
>   
>   struct dma_fence *amdgpu_ctx_get_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
> @@ -726,7 +797,7 @@ static void amdgpu_ctx_set_entity_priority(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
>   					   int hw_ip,
>   					   int32_t priority)
>   {
> -	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->mgr->adev;
>   	unsigned int hw_prio;
>   	struct drm_gpu_scheduler **scheds = NULL;
>   	unsigned num_scheds;
> @@ -791,10 +862,17 @@ int amdgpu_ctx_wait_prev_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
>   	return r;
>   }
>   
> -void amdgpu_ctx_mgr_init(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr)
> +void amdgpu_ctx_mgr_init(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr,
> +			 struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   {
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	mgr->adev = adev;
>   	mutex_init(&mgr->lock);
>   	idr_init(&mgr->ctx_handles);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
> +		atomic64_set(&mgr->time_spend[i], 0);
>   }
>   
>   long amdgpu_ctx_mgr_entity_flush(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr, long timeout)
> @@ -869,81 +947,3 @@ void amdgpu_ctx_mgr_fini(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr)
>   	idr_destroy(&mgr->ctx_handles);
>   	mutex_destroy(&mgr->lock);
>   }
> -
> -static void amdgpu_ctx_fence_time(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
> -		struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *centity, ktime_t *total, ktime_t *max)
> -{
> -	ktime_t now, t1;
> -	uint32_t i;
> -
> -	*total = *max = 0;
> -
> -	now = ktime_get();
> -	for (i = 0; i < amdgpu_sched_jobs; i++) {
> -		struct dma_fence *fence;
> -		struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence;
> -
> -		spin_lock(&ctx->ring_lock);
> -		fence = dma_fence_get(centity->fences[i]);
> -		spin_unlock(&ctx->ring_lock);
> -		if (!fence)
> -			continue;
> -		s_fence = to_drm_sched_fence(fence);
> -		if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(&s_fence->scheduled)) {
> -			dma_fence_put(fence);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -		t1 = s_fence->scheduled.timestamp;
> -		if (!ktime_before(t1, now)) {
> -			dma_fence_put(fence);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -		if (dma_fence_is_signaled(&s_fence->finished) &&
> -			s_fence->finished.timestamp < now)
> -			*total += ktime_sub(s_fence->finished.timestamp, t1);
> -		else
> -			*total += ktime_sub(now, t1);
> -		t1 = ktime_sub(now, t1);
> -		dma_fence_put(fence);
> -		*max = max(t1, *max);
> -	}
> -}
> -
> -ktime_t amdgpu_ctx_mgr_fence_usage(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr, uint32_t hwip,
> -		uint32_t idx, uint64_t *elapsed)
> -{
> -	struct idr *idp;
> -	struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx;
> -	uint32_t id;
> -	struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *centity;
> -	ktime_t total = 0, max = 0;
> -
> -	if (idx >= AMDGPU_MAX_ENTITY_NUM)
> -		return 0;
> -	idp = &mgr->ctx_handles;
> -	mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
> -	idr_for_each_entry(idp, ctx, id) {
> -		ktime_t ttotal, tmax;
> -
> -		if (!ctx->entities[hwip][idx])
> -			continue;
> -
> -		centity = ctx->entities[hwip][idx];
> -		amdgpu_ctx_fence_time(ctx, centity, &ttotal, &tmax);
> -
> -		/* Harmonic mean approximation diverges for very small
> -		 * values. If ratio < 0.01% ignore
> -		 */
> -		if (AMDGPU_CTX_FENCE_USAGE_MIN_RATIO(tmax, ttotal))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		total = ktime_add(total, ttotal);
> -		max = ktime_after(tmax, max) ? tmax : max;
> -	}
> -
> -	mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> -	if (elapsed)
> -		*elapsed = max;
> -
> -	return total;
> -}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.h
> index 142f2f87d44c..a28ebf3be764 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.h
> @@ -23,16 +23,20 @@
>   #ifndef __AMDGPU_CTX_H__
>   #define __AMDGPU_CTX_H__
>   
> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
>   #include "amdgpu_ring.h"
>   
>   struct drm_device;
>   struct drm_file;
>   struct amdgpu_fpriv;
> +struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr;
>   
>   #define AMDGPU_MAX_ENTITY_NUM 4
> -#define AMDGPU_CTX_FENCE_USAGE_MIN_RATIO(max, total) ((max) > 16384ULL*(total))
>   
>   struct amdgpu_ctx_entity {
> +	uint32_t		hw_ip;
>   	uint64_t		sequence;
>   	struct drm_sched_entity	entity;
>   	struct dma_fence	*fences[];
> @@ -40,7 +44,7 @@ struct amdgpu_ctx_entity {
>   
>   struct amdgpu_ctx {
>   	struct kref			refcount;
> -	struct amdgpu_device		*adev;
> +	struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr		*mgr;
A suggestion here, should we split this patch in 2 parts:
- introduce ctx_mgr and change the respective APIs
- use ctx_mgr and calculate the time spent per context

It would make it easier to read and review.

- Shashank

>   	unsigned			reset_counter;
>   	unsigned			reset_counter_query;
>   	uint32_t			vram_lost_counter;
> @@ -61,6 +65,7 @@ struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr {
>   	struct mutex		lock;
>   	/* protected by lock */
>   	struct idr		ctx_handles;
> +	atomic64_t		time_spend[AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM];
>   };
>   
>   extern const unsigned int amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM];
> @@ -70,9 +75,10 @@ int amdgpu_ctx_put(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx);
>   
>   int amdgpu_ctx_get_entity(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx, u32 hw_ip, u32 instance,
>   			  u32 ring, struct drm_sched_entity **entity);
> -void amdgpu_ctx_add_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
> -			  struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
> -			  struct dma_fence *fence, uint64_t *seq);
> +uint64_t amdgpu_ctx_add_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr,
> +			      struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
> +			      struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
> +			      struct dma_fence *fence);
>   struct dma_fence *amdgpu_ctx_get_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
>   				       struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>   				       uint64_t seq);
> @@ -85,10 +91,11 @@ int amdgpu_ctx_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   int amdgpu_ctx_wait_prev_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
>   			       struct drm_sched_entity *entity);
>   
> -void amdgpu_ctx_mgr_init(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr);
> +void amdgpu_ctx_mgr_init(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr,
> +			 struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>   void amdgpu_ctx_mgr_entity_fini(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr);
>   long amdgpu_ctx_mgr_entity_flush(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr, long timeout);
>   void amdgpu_ctx_mgr_fini(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr);
> -ktime_t amdgpu_ctx_mgr_fence_usage(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr, uint32_t hwip,
> -		uint32_t idx, uint64_t *elapsed);
> +ktime_t amdgpu_ctx_mgr_usage(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr, uint32_t hwip);
> +
>   #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fdinfo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fdinfo.c
> index 5a6857c44bb6..52c2b90925a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fdinfo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fdinfo.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>   
>   #include <drm/amdgpu_drm.h>
>   #include <drm/drm_debugfs.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>   
>   #include "amdgpu.h"
>   #include "amdgpu_vm.h"
> @@ -55,10 +56,10 @@ static const char *amdgpu_ip_name[AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM] = {
>   void amdgpu_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
>   {
>   	struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv;
> -	uint32_t bus, dev, fn, i, domain;
>   	uint64_t vram_mem = 0, gtt_mem = 0, cpu_mem = 0;
>   	struct drm_file *file = f->private_data;
>   	struct amdgpu_device *adev = drm_to_adev(file->minor->dev);
> +	uint32_t bus, dev, fn, domain, hw_ip;
>   	struct amdgpu_bo *root;
>   	int ret;
>   
> @@ -83,29 +84,25 @@ void amdgpu_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
>   	amdgpu_bo_unreserve(root);
>   	amdgpu_bo_unref(&root);
>   
> -	seq_printf(m, "pdev:\t%04x:%02x:%02x.%d\npasid:\t%u\n", domain, bus,
> -			dev, fn, fpriv->vm.pasid);
> -	seq_printf(m, "vram mem:\t%llu kB\n", vram_mem/1024UL);
> -	seq_printf(m, "gtt mem:\t%llu kB\n", gtt_mem/1024UL);
> -	seq_printf(m, "cpu mem:\t%llu kB\n", cpu_mem/1024UL);
> -	for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; i++) {
> -		uint32_t count = amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i];
> -		int idx = 0;
> -		uint64_t total = 0, min = 0;
> -		uint32_t perc, frac;
> +	/*
> +	 * ******************************************************************
> +	 * For text output format description please see drm-usage-stats.rst!
> +	 * ******************************************************************
> +	 */
>   
> -		for (idx = 0; idx < count; idx++) {
> -			total = amdgpu_ctx_mgr_fence_usage(&fpriv->ctx_mgr,
> -				i, idx, &min);
> -			if ((total == 0) || (min == 0))
> -				continue;
> +	seq_printf(m, "drm-driver:\t%s\n", file->minor->dev->driver->name);
> +	seq_printf(m, "drm-pdev:\t%04x:%02x:%02x.%d\npasid:\t%u\n", domain, bus,
> +			dev, fn, fpriv->vm.pasid);
> +	seq_printf(m, "drm-memory-vram:\t%llu KiB\n", vram_mem/1024UL);
> +	seq_printf(m, "drm-memory-gtt:\t%llu KiB\n", gtt_mem/1024UL);
> +	seq_printf(m, "drm-memory-cpu:\t%llu KiB\n", cpu_mem/1024UL);
> +	for (hw_ip = 0; hw_ip < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++hw_ip) {
> +		ktime_t usage = amdgpu_ctx_mgr_usage(&fpriv->ctx_mgr, hw_ip);
>   
> -			perc = div64_u64(10000 * total, min);
> -			frac = perc % 100;
> +		if (!usage)
> +			continue;
>   
> -			seq_printf(m, "%s%d:\t%d.%d%%\n",
> -					amdgpu_ip_name[i],
> -					idx, perc/100, frac);
> -		}
> +		seq_printf(m, "drm-engine-%s:\t%Ld ns\n",
> +			   amdgpu_ip_name[hw_ip], ktime_to_ns(usage));
>   	}
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> index 6b626c293e72..0814e6508a00 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ int amdgpu_driver_open_kms(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
>   	mutex_init(&fpriv->bo_list_lock);
>   	idr_init(&fpriv->bo_list_handles);
>   
> -	amdgpu_ctx_mgr_init(&fpriv->ctx_mgr);
> +	amdgpu_ctx_mgr_init(&fpriv->ctx_mgr, adev);
>   
>   	file_priv->driver_priv = fpriv;
>   	goto out_suspend;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-13  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 12:02 [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Convert to common fdinfo format v3 Christian König
2022-05-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: add drm-client-id to fdinfo Christian König
2022-05-13  8:20   ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-05-13  8:18 ` Sharma, Shashank [this message]
2022-05-13 10:25   ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Convert to common fdinfo format v3 Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45400d34-b7c8-851a-bc15-e9b4171c0356@amd.com \
    --to=shashank.sharma@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=David.Nieto@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.