From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [89.149.200.90] (helo=mail.kynisk.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GdckG-0005Ws-6J for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:12:20 +0200 Received: from [10.0.0.22] (54.84-48-194.nextgentel.com [84.48.194.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kynisk.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067109A9FC for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:09:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4542AE65.2040102@kynisk.com> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:12:05 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind_Repvik?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <200610271801.52172.openembedded@hrw.one.pl> <1161978194.1649.335.camel@gandalf.tm.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> In-Reply-To: <1161978194.1649.335.camel@gandalf.tm.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:18:26 +0200 Subject: Re: RFC: More granular libraries packaging X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:12:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Am Freitag, den 27.10.2006, 18:01 +0200 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz: >> My proposition is - let split each library to separate package. This w= ill=20 >> enlarge feeds (so ipkg will get hurt more ;( but in some situations ca= n=20 >> give us smaller rootfs. >=20 > +1 from me, however would this be explicit or implicit, i.e. do we need > to opt-in for it to happen (e.g. by inheriting package_libs) or do we > need to opt-out for it _not_ to happen (e.g. by defining > PACKAGE_LIBS_AUTOMATIC =3D "0"). I wouldn't mind it being opt-out, since that makes it somewhat easier=20 (imho) to figure out which packages "break" with this change. Regards, =D8yvind "NAiL" Repvik