From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amin Azez Subject: Re: connbytes & 64bit counters Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:01:52 +0000 Message-ID: <4545E9B0.40607@ufomechanic.net> References: <453FE325.1040502@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: To: Krzysztof Oledzki In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org * Krzysztof Oledzki wrote, On 28/10/06 17:48: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> It was changed to save some memory in struct ip_conntrack. >> The idea was mainly that its only used for ctnetlink and >> it is possible to send events before overflow. Obviously, >> this wasn't true (besides the fact that events are unreliable). >> Not sure what we should do about it .. > > How about attached (and inlined for easy review) patch? I prefer 64 bit counters and am going to have to put them back; so thanks for this. Sam