From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <45462730.2050807@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:24:16 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Results of xenomai's latency test vs. RTAI's References: <1162219241.5188.21.camel@domain.hid> <1162208265.4955.17.camel@domain.hid> <21364954.1162202747823.JavaMail.ngmail@domain.hid> <16802252.1162217706570.JavaMail.ngmail@domain.hid> <15328399.1162222490427.JavaMail.ngmail@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <15328399.1162222490427.JavaMail.ngmail@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "M. Koehrer" Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org M. Koehrer wrote: > Hi everybody, >=20 > I have repeated the test using a parallel stress test (dd if=3D/dev/sda= of=3D/dev/null, I have > a SATA harddisk). > The results are that my RTAI latency of 4=B5s is not valid, here the la= tency is about 26=B5s. > However, xenomai shows a higher latency of about 40=B5s. Please show us your .config. --=20 Gilles Chanteperdrix