From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Starikovskiy Subject: Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2) Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:25:37 +0300 Message-ID: <454AFD01.4080306@linux.intel.com> References: <20061103024132.GG13381@stusta.de> <20061103025623.GB8816@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com ([143.182.124.22]:34202 "EHLO azsmga101.ch.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752021AbWKCIZm (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 03:25:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061103025623.GB8816@redhat.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Jones , Adrian Bunk , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Christian Could this be a problem? -------------------- ... CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m ... CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=y ... Regards, Alex. Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:41:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc4 compared to 2.6.18 > > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. > > > > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one > > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch > > of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly > > involved with one or more of these issues. > > > > Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering. > > > > Subject : cpufreq not working on AMD K8 > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/10/114 > > Submitter : Christian > > Status : unknown > > As Mark mentioned in his followup, powernow-k8 didn't change in .19 at all. > I'm suspecting an ACPI change meant that we no longer find the PST tables > correctly. > > Christian, can you post the full dmesg's from the working/broken kernels. > It may be useful to enable CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG too. > > Dave >