From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] Reduce timer updates in __nf_ct_refresh_acct() Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:54:36 +0100 Message-ID: <454B4A1C.8070602@trash.net> References: <20061101210845.337590368@wlug.westbo.se> <20061101210914.886519886@wlug.westbo.se> <454B3867.5070004@trash.net> <454B46BB.9070908@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel Return-path: To: Martin Josefsson In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Martin Josefsson wrote: > On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>That sounds like a good way to fix it. I think I saw that patch on the >>link you sent me some time ago, IIRC it touches core kernel code, so >>you should probably send the timer part seperately to lkml. > > > Yes that's why I havn't submitted it yet, hopefully they won't scream too > loudly about the changes. I think it makes sense in cases like conntrack to synchronize by the timers, so its a good addition IMO.