Re: [PATCH] s390 need definitions for pagefault_disable and pagefault_enable

[Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>]

Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:09:44AM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>> Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:35:21PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/uaccess_std.c b/arch/s390/lib/uaccess_std.c
>>>> index 9bbeaa0..ad296dc 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/s390/lib/uaccess_std.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/s390/lib/uaccess_std.c
>>>> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
>>>>  
>>>>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>>>>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>>>> +
>>>>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>>  #include <asm/futex.h>
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/2/54
>>>
>>> ;)
>> Perhaps it would be helpful if these went out as replies to akpm's -mm
>> announcement else you have to sift the whole of lkml for them :(.
> 
> ??? It was the first reply to the -mm accouncement and that's where you
> can find it in the tree: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/2/33

Applogies, I have no idea what kind of user incompetance led me twice to
look and miss it.  But for sure its there.

-apw