From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: brian.haley@hp.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: only modify checksum for UDP
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:17:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45550872.6050900@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061110.145507.112290147.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:24:45 -0500
>
>> Only change upper-layer checksum from 0 to 0xFFFF for UDP (as RFC 768
>> states), not for others as RFC 4443 doesn't require it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
>
> Applied, thanks Brian.
Brian Haley wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
>> Could you fscking read what you've replied to? Your -=1 will turn 0
>> into 0xffff instead of correct 0xfffe. IOW, it's broken in 1:65536
>> cases.
>
> I looked again at your previous email:
>
>> Note that even on little-endian you want
>> 3 -> 2
>> 2 -> 1
>> 1 -> 0xffff
>> 0 -> 0xfffe
>
> That doesn't look right to me, but I'll take your word that there's one
> edge case out there I don't see (even though this worked on Alpha).
> Forget about the patch then.
Er, given all of the above, Brian, could you share your test cases
and/or other/any information on testing this?
thanks,
Nivedita
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-10 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-08 22:13 why do we mangle checksums for v6 ICMP? Al Viro
2006-11-08 22:28 ` Al Viro
2006-11-09 17:32 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-09 23:14 ` David Miller
2006-11-10 16:24 ` [PATCH] IPv6: only modify checksum for UDP Brian Haley
2006-11-10 17:54 ` David Stevens
2006-11-14 0:50 ` David Miller
2006-11-14 1:18 ` Al Viro
2006-11-14 1:44 ` David Stevens
2006-11-14 1:52 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 22:55 ` David Miller
2006-11-10 23:17 ` Nivedita Singhvi [this message]
2006-11-10 23:26 ` David Miller
2006-11-10 23:36 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2006-11-12 1:30 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 16:25 ` [PATCH] IPv6: optimize echo reply checksum calculation Brian Haley
2006-11-10 17:34 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 17:51 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 18:05 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 18:20 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 19:04 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 19:17 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 21:06 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-11 1:45 ` Al Viro
2006-11-11 18:07 ` why do we mangle checksums for v6 ICMP? Bill Fink
2006-11-13 7:04 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45550872.6050900@us.ibm.com \
--to=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=brian.haley@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.