From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Furniss <lists@andyfurniss.entadsl.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:23:18 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Ingress qdisc bypassed on SNAT'ed traffic?
Message-Id: <4555C0B6.8000407@andyfurniss.entadsl.com>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <355a4e960611051946s4759a7c2k5e8dbe9aa3755342@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <355a4e960611051946s4759a7c2k5e8dbe9aa3755342@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

EKC wrote:
> Unfortunately, that NAT gateway address should have been a routable
> address (I'm debugging this in vmware at the moment).
> 
> Considering that, it looks like I'm going to have to play around with IMQ.

If you say no to packet action in kernel config then you get to choose 
the old policer - which does hook after deNAT.

Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc