From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] librte_table: modify release notes and deprecation notice Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:31:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4559812.S3lrcv5bV4@xps13> References: <1443220392-13434-1-git-send-email-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com> <2070341.uDM0XDVu2v@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Mcnamara, John" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34D88E7C for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:32:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so6116344wik.1 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:32:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-12 16:30, Mcnamara, John: > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > > If a v2 is needed, please squash the release notes changes with the API > > changes (patches 1 and 2). > > Hi Thomas, > > Could you clarify this? In general shouldn't we keep all lib/drivers/examples/doc changes in separate patches in the patchset? Why should we? When reviewing a patch, having the doc atomically updated with the code change will help to understand it.