From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Gordon Lack" Subject: Re: autofsv5 enhancement - map names in /proc/mounts Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:00:57 +0000 Message-ID: <455993D9.4010003@ggr.co.uk> References: <44AE7785.74E63D70@ggr.co.uk> <4554696C.5030400@ggr.co.uk> <45546B1F.5030306@ggr.co.uk> <1163213639.3113.15.camel@localhost> <45584448.2000102@ggr.co.uk> <1163432685.3016.21.camel@localhost> <4558A441.1030303@ggr.co.uk> <1163469607.3297.22.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1163469607.3297.22.camel@localhost> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org To: Ian Kent Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org Ian Kent wrote: > > I'd like to find a simple way to accommodate this while retaining the > multiple map functionality. Fine by me. Bear in mind that the map-name (the bit I'm suggesting should be added to /proc/mounts) will be different. eg: from your original example: /home /etc/auto.server1.home /home /etc/auto.server2.home So we'd end up with 2 lines in /proc/mounts: /etc/auto.server1.home /home autofs .... /etc/auto.server2.home /home autofs .... (I think...although whether the patch I sent is sufficient to achieve that I don't know)