[Fwd: Re: wan/pc300 bug found]

[Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --]

FYI...  I'm certainly willing to remove pc300, if nobody wants it.

But I am unsure whether this is a case of "vendor doesn't care" or 
"users don't care", which are two very different things...

	Jeff



[-- Attachment #2: Re: wan/pc300 bug found --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2050 bytes --]

From: "Squassoni, Daniela" <Daniela.Squassoni@avocent.com>
To: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: "Rosalino, Wanda" <Wanda.Rosalino@avocent.com>
Subject: RE: wan/pc300 bug found
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:43:29 -0600
Message-ID: <1EF69AC43C5ABC49985E42B84575ADB7091CEA8E@hsv-email.corp.avocent.com>


Jeff,

As PC300 is not being produced anymore, we decided that the best solution is to remove its driver from the kernel. I will send you a patch to do so, as soon as possible.

Best regards,

Daniela


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jeff@garzik.org]
Sent: Sun 10/1/2006 1:35 PM
To: pc300@cyclades.com; khc@pm.waw.pl; netdev@vger.kernel.org; LKML; Andrew Morton
Subject: wan/pc300 bug found
 

The following gcc warning indicates a bug:

drivers/net/wan/pc300_drv.c: In function 'cpc_open':
drivers/net/wan/pc300_drv.c:2870: warning: 'br' may be used uninitialized in this function

clock_rate_calc() is not checked for a negative return value.