From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030722AbWKORLU (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:11:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030718AbWKORLU (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:11:20 -0500 Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com ([195.33.99.129]:18101 "EHLO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030723AbWKORLT (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:11:19 -0500 Message-Id: <455B5892.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.1 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:12:34 +0000 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Hugh Dickins" Cc: "Andi Kleen" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: adjust pmd_bad() References: <455B3AF2.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> Hugh Dickins 15.11.06 18:01 >>> >On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Make pmd_bad() symmetrical to pgd_bad() and pud_bad(). At once, >> simplify them all. > >Symmetrical and simpler, yes, but you're weakening the pmd_bad() test: >no longer requires that all those _KERNPG_TABLE bits be set. Wouldn't >it be better to go the other way and strengthen pgd_bad, pud_bad? Maybe, but there must have been a reason for not doing so. It could certainly be a follow-up patch - if it works. Jan