From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
akpm@osdl.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386-pda UP optimization
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:28:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <455B5C54.1050301@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611151905.04712.dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I have the feeling (most probably wrong, but I prefer to speak than keeping
> this for myself) that the cost of segment load is delayed up to the first use
> of a segment selector. Sort of a lazy reload...
>
Probably not too much, since the load itself has to raise a fault if
there's any problem with the segment itself, and once it is loaded you
can change the underlying descriptor without affecting the segment
register. Even if it were lazy, that would only make the first %gs use a
bit slow, and shouldn't affect the subsequent ones. However, when I
measured segment register use timings, I didn't see any dramatic costs
associated with segment register use which would account for a 5% hit in
your benchmark.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-15 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-12 7:35 i386 PDA patches use of %gs Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-12 7:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-12 7:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-12 8:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 11:27 ` [PATCH] i386-pda UP optimization Eric Dumazet
2006-11-15 11:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-15 17:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-15 17:24 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-15 17:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-15 17:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-15 17:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-15 18:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-21 11:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-21 21:42 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-21 21:52 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-21 22:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-21 21:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-21 23:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 17:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 17:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-15 17:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 18:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-15 18:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2006-11-15 18:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-15 18:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-15 18:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 19:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-17 0:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 17:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-28 23:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-29 9:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-29 9:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-13 1:00 ` i386 PDA patches use of %gs Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-13 9:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-09-13 16:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 18:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-15 18:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-15 18:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 18:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-15 18:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 18:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-15 18:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 18:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-15 19:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-11-15 19:03 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=455B5C54.1050301@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.