From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=EBl?= Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:25:22 +0000 Subject: Re: Super/HyperSPARC (2.6.18.2) Message-Id: <455F17D2.4060002@systella.fr> List-Id: References: <20061116154638.GA3138@rayleigh.systella.fr> In-Reply-To: <20061116154638.GA3138@rayleigh.systella.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Ulrich Teichert a =E9crit : > Hi, >=20 >=20 >> I use some SS20 to tests (as routers). All of these workstations have 2 >> SSII/75, but I have some single and dual RT626. >> >> On one SS20, I have changed SuperSPARC by HyperSPARC. It runs with a >> 2.6.18.2 linux kernel and a debian/testing. With ROOS, I can see a very >> strange mistake : apt-get returns a random error (only occurs with >> hypersparc, UP and SMP). >> >> I have tested all motherboards and modules I have used for test with Sol= aris >> and netbsd. All work fine. I don't understand why I only see this bug wi= th >> apt-get. Is there any issue ? A bug in hypersparc specific code ? >=20 >=20 > What PROM version do you use? I had strange errors as well until I updated > the PROMs, I use a regular 2.25R from ROSS technology. Same trouble with 2.25=20 (that doesn't officialy support RT626). I have remounted the SS20 with=20 two SS-II and I shall test on another SS20 with a 2.25W from ROSS=20 (hyperstation). Regards, JKB