From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <455F4A24.8060408@domain.hid> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:00:04 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Buildbot: Errors building rtnet since at least r1834 References: <200611181818.17629.niklaus.giger@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <200611181818.17629.niklaus.giger@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCF9C6E3B38819679A1216444" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: niklaus.giger@domain.hid Cc: xenomai-core This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCF9C6E3B38819679A1216444 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Niklaus Giger wrote: > Hi >=20 > Unfortunately I cannot say since when this build is broken, as I had to= =20 > reinstall the buildbot on my main server. But this particular build tar= get=20 > should not have been affected. (Same compiler, same build slave, same=20 > scripts) >=20 > But since at November 12 I get the following errors in my builds: > See http://ngiger.dyndns.org/buildbot-full/tqm_f/builds/0/step-mk_RTnet= /1 > libtool: link: warning: library=20 > `/var/buildbot/install/tqm_f-r1834/usr/xenomai/lib/libpthread_rt.la' wa= s=20 > moved. > libtool: link: warning: library=20 > `/var/buildbot/install/tqm_f-r1834/usr/xenomai/lib/librtdm.la' was move= d. > libtool: link: warning: library=20 > `/var/buildbot/install/tqm_f-r1834/usr/xenomai/lib/libpthread_rt.la' wa= s=20 > moved. > libtool: link: warning: library=20 > `/var/buildbot/install/tqm_f-r1834/usr/xenomai/lib/librtdm.la' was move= d. >=20 > Has anybody a hint, what the reason could be? DESTDIR issue? Are you compiling both Xenomai and RTnet with the same DESTDIR? Check what's stated in those .la files and compare with the RTnet build parameters. Jan PS: This is a *warning*, not a fatal *error*. Or did you just want to receive more attention? ;) --------------enigCF9C6E3B38819679A1216444 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFX0opniDOoMHTA+kRAt4cAJ9urRn71HdSgf6gPSRv2M8aG+k/VwCbBc6g ddzQGS7hqtaUUzUPcP839GQ= =f42X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCF9C6E3B38819679A1216444--