From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amin Azez Subject: Re: [RFC] XML output for libnetfilter_conntrack Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:46:22 +0000 Message-ID: <45632D5E.2020102@ufomechanic.net> References: <4563061F.4080904@netfilter.org> <456322E6.4070901@ufomechanic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Leblond Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <456322E6.4070901@ufomechanic.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org * Amin Azez wrote, On 21/11/06 16:01: > I suggest an alternative compact version from which greater verboseness > might be justified. > > > packets="1" bytes="10"> > src="00:00:00:00:00:00" dst="00:00:00:00:00:00"/> > > > | > ... etc > | > > > I realise that layer2 isn't part of the main conntrack but it is part of > my conntrack, so I put it in there. I guess at name and number for layer2. > > Maybe sport and dport should be used for L4 and not src and dst again...?? We should include a timestamp and (short-term-unique) conntrack-id in that, and maybe even a created time if we keep it (I can't remember now): Sam