From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>, Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>,
Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Dmitry Mishin <dim@sw.ru>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:46:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <456454C4.5010803@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061121181655.GA14656@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
> no problem here, but I think we will need another one,
> or some smart way to do the network isolation (layer 3)
> for the network namespace (as alternative to the layer 2
> approach) ...
My feeling (Dmitry and Daniel can correct me) is that it will be
addressed with an unshare-like flag : NETNS2 and NETNS3.
> as they are both complementary in some way, I'm not sure
> a single space will suffice ...
hmm, so you think there could be a 2 differents namespaces
for network to handle layer 2 or 3. Couldn't that be just a sub part
of net_namespace.
C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-22 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-21 13:34 [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework Cedric Le Goater
2006-11-21 13:51 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-11-21 18:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-11-21 18:16 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-11-22 13:46 ` Cedric Le Goater [this message]
2006-11-22 17:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-22 22:56 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-11-23 9:05 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-11-22 8:21 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-11-22 8:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-22 13:23 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-11-22 13:34 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-11-22 9:55 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-11-22 13:53 ` Cedric Le Goater
2006-11-22 16:41 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-11-22 16:55 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-11-23 2:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-11-23 9:07 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-11-23 9:24 ` Cedric Le Goater
2006-11-29 17:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-11-22 16:57 ` Cedric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=456454C4.5010803@fr.ibm.com \
--to=clg@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=dim@sw.ru \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.