From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4566C5AF.7030107@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:13:03 +0100 From: Wolfgang Grandegger MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Adeos support for 2.6.18 merged PowerPC architecture. References: <20061124105346.e442448d.benjamin.zores@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <20061124105346.e442448d.benjamin.zores@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Benjamin Zores Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Benjamin Zores wrote: > Hi, > > I've downloaded latest Adeos/Ipipe patch for PPC and unfortunately this > latest doesn't (yet) support the ARCH=powerpc architecture from kernel > but only the PPC one. Yes, the PowerPC tree is not yet supported. > I've tried porting the changes to support the PPC_MERGE and be able to > still use Xenomai on 2.6.18 with ARCH=powerpc. Nice. > Attached is a patch that has to be applied after regular adeos-2.6.18-ppc > patch to extends supports for PowerPC. > Please consider it for review only right now as it might not yet compiles to the > end (i'm facing problems with includes inter-race which required me to change > the radix-tree.h header file which is something i don't want to). You might have realized my hack to get ride of radix-tree.h for the ppc tree. > I also have problems booting my latest kernel with this patch on > (but booting regular 2.6.18 in merged PowerPC architecture already is a hassle atm) > and I'd like you to help me know whether it cames from my patch's content or not. What defconfig do you use? Unfortunately I do not have a board by hand supported by the PowerPC tree. > FYI, I've tried to port all Adeos architecture dependant parts but i only focused > on PPC32 (PPC64 support might be in but i won't test on it). I'm also trying to boot an MPC8349 chip but i don't think I'll have to address anything with it as it used to work with Xenomai on 2.6.14. > > Thanks for the review, I will have a look a.s.s.p. Wolfgang.