All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wink Saville <wink@saville.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: unify/rewrite SMP TSC sync code
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:56:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4567B0CC.4030802@saville.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061124202514.GA7608@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> a new CPU is added. If the TSC isnt sync on SMP then it quickly gets 
> pretty messy, and we should rather take a look at /why/ these apps are 
> using RDTSC.
> 
> 	Ingo
> -

I use RDTSC in get a cheap method of measuring time. What other choices are
there for a low overhead high frequency time source?

By low overhead a kernel call is way to expensive, I want to minimally impact
the code and have many of these calls through out the code. One of the
ways I use it is to instrument multi-threaded applications and then use
the TSC to compare when actions occur between threads. i.e. I use it as a
time stamp counter and neither precision or accuracy is too important.
On the other hand the more precise and accurate the better:)

Cheers,

Wink Saville



  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-25  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-24 17:02 [patch] x86: unify/rewrite SMP TSC sync code Ingo Molnar
2006-11-24 17:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-24 20:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-24 20:37     ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-24 20:46       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-24 21:06         ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-24 22:48     ` Ben Greear
2006-11-25  2:56     ` Wink Saville [this message]
2006-11-25  8:30       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-25 16:58         ` Wink Saville
2006-11-25 17:41           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-25 20:34             ` Wink Saville
2006-11-27 19:00   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-29  7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found] <fa./NRPJg+JjfSQLUVwnX1GpHGIojQ@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.Y0RKABHd+7qnbGQYBAGPvlJ0Qic@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.fD3WSpNqEJ4736vYzEak5Gf3xTw@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]     ` <fa.A+gkQAO1DLThaxJxPLPl3yE1CGo@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]       ` <fa.INurNKWdUKAEULTHyfpSW65a/Ng@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]         ` <fa.n9vySiI9RS2MCl0DZPDzxZEPiFw@ifi.uio.no>
2006-11-26  7:20           ` Robert Hancock
2006-11-26  8:16             ` Wink Saville
2006-11-26  8:24               ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-26 19:48                 ` Wink Saville
2006-11-27  7:51                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-27  9:15                     ` Wink Saville
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-27 17:23 Robert Crocombe
2006-11-27 18:41 ` Max Krasnyansky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4567B0CC.4030802@saville.com \
    --to=wink@saville.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.