From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]: conntrack: fix refcount leak when findingexpectation Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:14:08 +0100 Message-ID: <456C3620.9080209@trash.net> References: <200611232315.kANNFVi3006773@toshiba.co.jp> <456B214A.5090207@trash.net> <200611271132.21563.alan.ezust@presinet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, pablo@netfilter.org Return-path: To: Alan Ezust In-Reply-To: <200611271132.21563.alan.ezust@presinet.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Alan Ezust wrote: > I noticed many messages indicating that things are being applied to conntrack > and their related libs - but whenever I check my own checked out copy from > svn (rev 6698), it does not show me anything new to update, and it appears as > if nobody is committing to that particular part of the repo. Are you > committing these changes to a branch other than trunk? This patch was against the kernel not the libraries. The others you mention probably as well.