From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: 2.6.18 - AHCI detection pauses excessively Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:27:11 -0500 Message-ID: <456DDF0F.6080501@rtr.ca> References: <4557B7D2.2050004@gmail.com> <455B0BD7.20108@gmail.com> <455B5ADF.2040503@gmail.com> <20061127033550.GB11250@htj.dyndns.org> <456AA89C.909@gmail.com> <456D4B17.4080503@gmail.com> <456DD70D.1050808@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:48913 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967581AbWK2T1O (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:27:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <456DD70D.1050808@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "Berck E. Nash" Cc: Tejun Heo , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" Berck E. Nash wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: > >> Then, a series of obsolete STANDBY failures. Who's issuing these >> commands? It's not libata, libata uses STANDBY (0xe2). Is it some >> kind of gentoo thing? > > Nope, Debian/Unstable. Most probably my hdparm utility. It first tries the old STANDBY command, then tries the newer one if the first one fails. This should not cause anybody's system to lock up. Cheers