All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org>
To: wenji@fnal.gov
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, akpm@osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Changelog] - Potential performance bottleneck for Linxu TCP
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:36:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <456E196E.2080802@mbligh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HNEBLGGMEGLPMPPDOPMGCEAKCGAA.wenji@fnal.gov>

Wenji Wu wrote:
> From: Wenji Wu <wenji@fnal.gov>
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> For Linux TCP, when the network applcaiton make system call to move data
> from
> socket's receive buffer to user space by calling tcp_recvmsg(). The socket
> will
> be locked. During the period, all the incoming packet for the TCP socket
> will go
> to the backlog queue without being TCP processed. Since Linux 2.6 can be
> inerrupted mid-task, if the network application expires, and moved to the
> expired array with the socket locked, all the packets within the backlog
> queue
> will not be TCP processed till the network applicaton resume its execution.
> If
> the system is heavily loaded, TCP can easily RTO in the Sender Side.


So how much difference did this patch actually make, and to what
benchmark?

> The patch is for Linux kernel 2.6.14 Deskop and Low-latency Desktop

The patch oesn't seem to be attached? Also, would be better to make
it for the latest kernel version (2.6.19) ... 2.6.14 is rather old ;-)

M

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-29 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <HNEBLGGMEGLPMPPDOPMGKEAJCGAA.wenji@fnal.gov>
2006-11-29 23:27 ` [Changelog] - Potential performance bottleneck for Linxu TCP Wenji Wu
2006-11-29 23:28   ` [patch 1/4] " Wenji Wu
2006-11-29 23:29     ` [patch 2/4] " Wenji Wu
2006-11-29 23:30       ` [patch 3/4] " Wenji Wu
2006-11-29 23:31         ` [patch 4/4] " Wenji Wu
2006-11-30  0:53     ` [patch 1/4] " David Miller
2006-11-30  1:08       ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-30  1:13         ` David Miller
2006-11-30  6:04         ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-29 23:36   ` Martin Bligh [this message]
2006-11-29 23:42 ` Bug 7596 " Andrew Morton
2006-11-30  6:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-19 18:37     ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-12-19 23:52       ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-20  2:55         ` David Miller
2006-12-20  5:11           ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-12-20  5:15             ` David Miller
2006-11-30  1:01 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=456E196E.2080802@mbligh.org \
    --to=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wenji@fnal.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.