From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <457064F3.5050300@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:22:59 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai Example Repository References: <457002EB.8080106@domain.hid> <45705C11.2010502@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <45705C11.2010502@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3B30FFFA836869C92A748305" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wolfgang Grandegger Cc: xenomai-help , xenomai-core This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3B30FFFA836869C92A748305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the new Xenomai example repository has been created. I don't want to >> repeat here what is explained already on the related wiki page, please= >> have a look at >> >> http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/Examples >> >> Instead, let me sketch what could be done next: >> >> o Port existing examples, snippets, demos from ksrc/skins/* over, mak= e >> them compilable and runnable if required. >> >> o Identify what kind of examples are lacking. You, the user, is neede= d >> here. What do *you* think is missing, what would be helpful to show= ? >> >> o Check what is needed to compile kernel-based examples over PPC 2.4.= >> Philippe indicated that some switches are likely missing (x86 is fi= ne >> already, other archs are 2.6-only). >=20 > Some time ago I sent a patch for RTnet using the "kernel CFLAGS > capturing" trick to get proper switches for 2.4: >=20 > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3D9493711&forum_= id=3D24610 >=20 >=20 > We could do the same trick here. Yeah, I had a look at this before. The point is that I would prefer to keep things _simple_ and self-contained. This capturing requires some helper Makefile and complex call nestings that likely only people with advanced make and shell skills can understand and adopt to their projects= =2E But maybe things are that complicated already, and this is just different complexity. How do you compile simple out-of-tree modules against 2.4 PPC kernels? Are there any standard flags? Or is it different for each board or each compiler version or whatever? Jan --------------enig3B30FFFA836869C92A748305 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFcGTzniDOoMHTA+kRAqqgAJ4nnYid1fcFdFul7hUY6/iGTnI7rwCeLqDA Sq6YGCx8jfAsH9HN7h8k5JM= =RZvL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3B30FFFA836869C92A748305--