From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Chmielewski Subject: Re: [PATCH]: via 6421 PATA support done in a rather cleaner fashion Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:27:33 +0100 Message-ID: <45744C75.7080808@wpkg.org> References: <45742FFA.6020604@wpkg.org> <20061204152105.6132a59c@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.syneticon.net ([213.239.212.131]:52959 "EHLO mail2.syneticon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937093AbWLDQ14 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:27:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061204152105.6132a59c@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cc: Linux IDE , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik Alan wrote: > Wants testing... so test and report > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox > > --- linux.vanilla-2.6.19-rc6-mm1/drivers/ata/sata_via.c 2006-11-24 13:58:05.000000000 +0000 > +++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1/drivers/ata/sata_via.c 2006-12-04 14:57:34.719099648 +0000 PATA works fine with this patch, great. Being on sata_via subject - why did it start to appear in 2.6.19 kernel (even without any pata patch)? # rmmod sata_via ata6.00: disabled Synchronizing SCSI cache for disk sdb: FAILED status = 0, message = 00, host = 4, driver = 00 Other sata modules I tried unload fine. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org