From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <45753DAB.20207@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:36:43 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] [PATCH] I-pipe tracer for ARM References: <45745F6F.2050101@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig56EBB03DB2F28A2CB7AF2BFA" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sebastian Smolorz Cc: adeos-main@gna.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig56EBB03DB2F28A2CB7AF2BFA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sebastian Smolorz wrote: >>> < +freeze 0xffffffff 0 97.444N __ipipe_frozen_ctrl+0x108 >>> (vfs_write+0xc4) >> Hmm, takes quite a long time to complete the freeze though you only ha= ve >> 10 post-trace points (which defines its complexity). Unusual, also whe= n >> comparing with other traced functions. >=20 > It seems that it doesn't depend on post-trace-points. When I reduce the= m to 2=20 > the value for the freeze does not get smaller. Maybe it has something t= o do=20 > with the following lines? Are you tracing into vmalloc'ed memory? And what results do you get with latency -f? Jan --------------enig56EBB03DB2F28A2CB7AF2BFA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFdT2rniDOoMHTA+kRAmLcAJ9PmOA8jn1Id7drnUYwEThwPXD/tACeNlVX eCL4aAolYp+E9qMRBIewfpI= =J+ff -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig56EBB03DB2F28A2CB7AF2BFA--