From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] r8169: fix invalid register dump Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:13:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4578926.BDvSIdbm2b@al> References: <1376833298-7321-1-git-send-email-lekensteyn@gmail.com> <18365346.kxAWDne41Q@al> <20130821205325.GA24054@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: David Miller , bhutchings@solarflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nic_swsd@realtek.com To: Francois Romieu Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:57287 "EHLO mail-wg0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751836Ab3HUVNk (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:13:40 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id n12so879949wgh.12 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:13:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130821205325.GA24054@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wednesday 21 August 2013 22:53:25 Francois Romieu wrote: > Peter Wu : > [...] > > > Please find the updated patch below. There may be differences in lines > > because net-next has the r8169,sis190 patch and net the WOL fix. > > > > Can I consider Francois reply[1] as Acked-by? > > Yes, provided you insert an empty line between declarations and code. Done, new patch will arrive in a minute. > You may / should send patches as normal submissions. It will probably > be easier for davem to use and you can always raise questions or add > minor remarks in the "--- ... diff" section. I noticed that patchwork also recognized submissions that are appended to a mail, so I tried that out ;-) Well, apparantly it does not work well with git, so I will just send a new patch with a useful In-Reply-To header. Peter