From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Goirand Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:36:32 +0000 Subject: Re: Website for mlmmj Message-Id: <45793220.3090405@goirand.fr> List-Id: References: <20061207113941.GC28318@mmj.dk> In-Reply-To: <20061207113941.GC28318@mmj.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org Raymond den Ouden wrote: > I myself hate such default templates. > > No offense, but they are often bady built. I always split the content > from the layout. Then even blind people can use it, or people with text > browsers like lynx or links, which I often use when downloading files. > If mads likes one it's often easy to make a proper design for that. On my experience with those templates, they ARE done the way you say, most of the time using pure CSS design with div tags. > CMS systems are not silly, probably cpu eaters, but often very useful, > especially when you make a site which has to be maintained by someone > else who can't build proper HTML pages. Although static HTML is the > fastest and most stable way of hosting. My mean is only to say that it's a bit silly to use a (CPU eater) CMS when we all know html, and when the content WILL be static. Thomas