From: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>
To: Stefan Rompf <stefan@loplof.de>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
dwmw2@infradead.org, joseph@codesourcery.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [NETLINK]: Restore API compatibility of address and neighbour bits
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:33:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4579A1FE.1040200@jg555.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612081526.12651.stefan@loplof.de>
I have seen issues with some version of unifdef remove any instance of
__KERNEL__, is the #ifndef __KERNEL__ really necessary. Has anyone
tested to make sure the install_headers will not accidently remove this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-08 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-06 17:20 Kernel header changes break glibc build Joseph S. Myers
2006-12-03 12:25 ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-04 9:13 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-06 13:01 ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-06 13:43 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-12-06 13:51 ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-06 13:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-12-06 14:01 ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-06 13:59 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-06 14:07 ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-06 14:18 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-12-06 14:31 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-06 17:13 ` Al Viro
2006-12-06 20:26 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-06 20:34 ` Al Viro
2006-12-06 21:35 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-06 14:23 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-07 11:29 ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-06 19:32 ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-06 20:22 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-07 0:56 ` David Miller
2006-12-07 10:47 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-07 10:51 ` David Miller
2006-12-07 10:55 ` [NETLINK]: Restore API compatibility of address and neighbour bits Thomas Graf
2006-12-07 11:28 ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-08 7:52 ` David Miller
2006-12-08 7:50 ` David Miller
2006-12-08 14:25 ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-08 17:33 ` Jim Gifford [this message]
2006-12-08 17:54 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-12-08 21:33 ` David Miller
2006-12-08 21:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-08 21:47 ` David Miller
2006-12-08 21:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-09 0:43 ` David Miller
2006-12-09 1:14 ` David Miller
2006-12-09 10:39 ` [NETLINK]: Schedule removal of old macros exported to userspace Thomas Graf
2006-12-09 11:49 ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-09 12:55 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-09 14:58 ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-09 21:50 ` David Miller
2006-12-09 22:02 ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-12 11:23 ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-09 21:49 ` David Miller
2006-12-09 21:45 ` David Miller
2006-12-09 23:28 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-10 10:11 ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-10 12:15 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-12 6:56 ` dhcpclient netlink bugs (was Re: [NETLINK]: Schedule removal of old macros exported to userspace) Stefan Rompf
2006-12-15 0:46 ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-10 1:42 ` [NETLINK]: Schedule removal of old macros exported to userspace Jeff Bailey
2006-12-10 1:52 ` Al Viro
2006-12-09 9:56 ` [NETLINK]: Restore API compatibility of address and neighbour bits Stefan Rompf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4579A1FE.1040200@jg555.com \
--to=maillist@jg555.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@loplof.de \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.