Re: kernel.org mirroring (Re: [GIT PULL] MMC update)

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Lars Hjemli wrote:
> On 12/8/06, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> > I could write a simple C caching thing that just hashes the CGI 
>> arguments
>> > and uses a hash to create a cache (and proper lock-files etc to 
>> serialize
>> > access to a particular cache object while it's being created) fairly
>> > easily, but I'm pretty sure people would much prefer a mod_perl 
>> thing just
>> > to avoid the fork/exec overhead with Apache (I think mod_perl allows
>> > Apache to run perl scripts without it), and that means I'm not the 
>> right
>> > person any more.
>>
>> True about mod_perl.  Haven't messed with that myself, either.
>> fork/exec really is very cheap on Linux, so it's not a huge deal.
> 
> I've been playing around with a "native git" cgi thingy the last week
> (I call it cgit),  and I've been thinking about adding exactly this
> kind of caching to it. And since it's basically a standard git command
> written in C, it should have less overhead than any perl
> implementation.
> 

Trust me, perl, or CGI, is not the problem.  It's all about I/O traffic 
generated by git.