From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Eastep Subject: Re: iptables extension removal Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:29:10 -0800 Message-ID: <457DB186.4040006@shorewall.net> References: <457DAF95.2050203@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig92ECC47202E6F830DCC88134" Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <457DAF95.2050203@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig92ECC47202E6F830DCC88134 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Patrick McHardy wrote: > We have decided to remove extension for obsolete/out-of-tree > patches from iptables, moving the extensions for patches > maintained in pom or external repositories to the individual > patchlets and deleting the rest. =2E.. > libipt_iprange.c move to pom Patrick, Is ipt_range.c also moving from the main kernel tree to POM? -Tom --=20 Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key --------------enig92ECC47202E6F830DCC88134 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFfbGMO/MAbZfjDLIRAjHHAKCaXSYgT04VODvKsbQX4rEtJdUQmQCfQ5L7 L+zOBs6hX3WU3m55QilpFMs= =jfqx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig92ECC47202E6F830DCC88134--