From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: iptables extension removal
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:12:29 +0100
Message-ID: <457DD7CD.40709@trash.net>
References: <457DAF95.2050203@trash.net> <457DB186.4040006@shorewall.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
To: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
In-Reply-To: <457DB186.4040006@shorewall.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Tom Eastep wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>libipt_iprange.c		move to pom
> 
> Is ipt_range.c also moving from the main kernel tree to POM?

No, that one is a mistake. I wasn't aware it is part of the kernel.