From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gu7vz-0006nP-8G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:44:39 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gu7vy-0006mv-MV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:44:38 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gu7vy-0006mp-Hh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:44:38 -0500
Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gu7vy-0002nK-AM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:44:38 -0500
Message-ID: <457EB243.7000007@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:44:35 +0100
From: Oliver Gerlich <olig9@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Linux Kernel to Include KVM Virtualization
References: <8a6cde920612120531q5520cdebj81d02976f37b1ca9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8a6cde920612120531q5520cdebj81d02976f37b1ca9@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Ricardo Almeida wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just saw this on slashdot
> (http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/12/0135240). From the
> news:
> 
> "In a fashion comparable to that of Xen a modified QEMU is used for
> the supportive emulation of typical PC components of the virtual
> machines"
> 
> So, when it will run with a non-modified QEMU? ;)
> 
> I've looked at KVM homepage (http://kvm.sourceforge.net/) and it's a
> kernel module, so I think this can be some kind of replacement for
> KQEmu, no?
> Will QEmu/KQEmu support this?

Isn't KVM more like a kqemu which uses VT/Pacifica so that it runs 
processes "a bit more native"? That's how I understood it...

Though I'm wondering why this project apparently didn't announce itself 
on this list, at least for general information. Or, this can also be 
seen as a hint that Qemu is _so_ well-structured and well-documented 
that people are able to use its code without any questions ;-)

> 
> Thanks for the great work,
> Ricardo Almeida
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> 

Regards,
Oliver Gerlich