From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: load balacing with https home banking Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:47:03 +0100 Message-ID: <45812BA7.3000809@trash.net> References: <4580827A.7090708@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Marco Berizzi In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Marco Berizzi wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>Different TOS values might still break the thing, for it should work > > for > >>HTTP/HTTPS. > > > Just for ask: why different TOS values should break? Cached routes are keyed on (src,dst,iif,oif,mark,tos). Different tos values cause new routing lookups which might result in a different path.