From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GuqaL-0002to-9M
	for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:25:17 -0500
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GuqaJ-0002sQ-EY
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:25:15 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GuqaI-0002rP-EH
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:25:14 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuqaI-0002qu-1i
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:25:14 -0500
Received: from [199.232.41.67] (helo=mx20.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
	(Exim 4.52) id 1GuqaH-00063M-TT
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:25:14 -0500
Received: from [192.91.147.7] (helo=mailgw2a.lmco.com)
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gupn6-0007ZO-4n
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:34:24 -0500
Received: from emss01g01.ems.lmco.com (relay1.ems.lmco.com [129.197.181.54])by
	mailgw2a.lmco.com (LM-6) with ESMTP id kBECXLNh005618for
	<grub-devel@gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:33:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.lmco.com by lmco.com (PMDF V6.3-x3 #31239)
	id <0JA900401K7L2B@lmco.com> for grub-devel@gnu.org;
	Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:33:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [134.5.173.12] by lmco.com (PMDF V6.3-x3 #31239) with ESMTP id
	<0JA900EU2K7BSH@lmco.com> for
	grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:33:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:33:10 -0500
From: Damon Register <damon.w.register@lmco.com>
In-reply-to: <87irge7k1y.fsf@xs4all.nl>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Message-id: <45814486.7060604@lmco.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
References: <200612132236.kBDMaCNX019752@dell01.dinaserver.com>
	<458122F7.1040102@raulete.net> <87irge7k1y.fsf@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: disk vs partition numbering
X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/grub-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:25:15 -0000

Marco Gerards wrote:
> with counting.  No one starts counting with 0.  Except when you count
> partitions, of course. ;-)
what about arrays in C/C++ ?

Damon Register