From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: x86 swiotlb questions
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:46:45 +0000
Message-ID: <4582C365.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
References: <4582BC7C.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
	<C1A85F6A.624E%keir@xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C1A85F6A.624E%keir@xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

>>> Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com> 15.12.06 15:19 >>>
>On 15/12/06 14:17, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>
>>> Is this one of the patches you already sent in your 32-on-64 batch, or an
>>> additional one?
>> 
>> An additional one (or actually, a set of them, to make the individual steps
>> more clear). As a followup, I'm also planning to get rid of the Xen heaps
>> on those arches where they aren't needed (x86-64, not sure about ppc
>> and ia64, but I would assume it's really only x86-32 that needs it).
>
>Yes, that would be great. There are a couple of minor caveats around special
>semantics of the Xen heap but those could do with cleaning up and being made
>explicit anyway.

Mind adding a little more detail here?

Jan