From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:49:46 -0500
Message-ID: <4583187A.4020602@garzik.org>
References: <20061204203410.6152efec.akpm@osdl.org> <20061215192146.GA3616@amd64.of.nowhere> <17795.2681.523120.656367@cse.unsw.edu.au> <200612152215.23629.rjw@sisk.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S965171AbWLOVuH@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200612152215.23629.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Jurriaan <thunder7@xs4all.nl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The other box is mine and it works just fine with 2.6.20-rc1.
> 
>> I think something bad happened in sata land just recently.
> 
> Yup.  Please see, for example:
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116621656432500&w=2
> 
> It looks like the breakage is in sata, in the patches that went in after
> 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 (that one worked for me like charm).


So.... 2.6.20-rc1 works for you?

	Jeff